About us – who we are

http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-image-cross-image18151466

Bay Area Guy

I am a young white American man who is an ethnic mix of Greek and Nordic.
I was born and raised in the San Francisco Bay Area, but pursued my
college education in Southern California. I received a BA in history and am now working part-time while studying for grad school. My primary topics of interest are history, multiculturalism, immigration, and economics.

Dota

I am Indian by ethnicity, a Muslim by religion, and a Canadian by nationality. I immigrated to Canada 10 years ago from Dubai and completed my Bachelors of Business Administration in Toronto before moving to Saskatoon where I currently reside. Like my co-blogger, I have a passion for History in addition to some Philosophy.

Why we do this

Like most North Americans we too were born with a political consciousness that was liberal oriented at its inception. We took classes in the humanities and social sciences disciplines where liberal professors challenged the dominant ideologies of patriarchy and colonialism while substituting those ideologies with new ones: Feminism, Post modernism, and Communism. We realize today that the latter ideologies are not only antithetical to the foundational values of western civilization, but are also corrosive to the fabric of western societies. This website is intended to serve as a rallying point for free thinking individuals that wish to preserve the ethnic (white) and religious (Christian) character of Western societies. We hold a dim view of colonialism, imperialism, and blatant racism; but we equally condemn white bashing, Christian bashing, Multiculturalism, and Male bashing. We categorically reject the anti-foundationalist ontology that serves as the base for most modern left wing perspectives in favour of a  strong European and Christian identity for the west.

What makes us different

Unlike the legion of political pundits, academics, and media whores out there that impose the voice and will of the minority, we speak on behalf of the silent and loathed majority. We do not make a single cent of this website because this endeavour is a labour of love. We aren’t paid to do what we do here and our drive is born out of a sense of urgency; that Cultural Marxist and Liberal trends portend a dark future for Western Civilization. We are two ordinary men that study and work 9 to 5 jobs. We are one of you and we fight for you.

186 Responses to About us – who we are

  1. Janus says:

    The racial realism here, not just racial theory or ideology that dominates this subject, is not only refreshing but frankly fascinating. And a very entertaining site as well.

  2. Pranav says:

    DOTA and BAG can you guys recommend some books for history and philosophy which you’ve read. I have developed an immense interest towards History after viewing some of the articles in your site and Robert’s site…
    Congrats to you both, the site is pretty entertaining.

    • Dota says:

      Depends on what period and culture you are interested in. For Indian history I’d recommend Romila Thapar. I learned everything I know about the Incans from María Rostworowski. The history of the Israel Palestine conflict can be studied from various sources and I would recommend: Benny Morris, Norman Finklestein, and Noam Chomsky (although we don’t trust him). Philosophy is trickier. I’ve picked up philosophy from various places, university, independent study, and free acedemic portals like academia.edu and the praxis journal of philosophy (praxisjp.org/‎) are pretty handy.

      Glad you’re liking the website too.

  3. Peace Loving Whitey says:

    Addressing the owners of this site———

    I really cannot believe that racism masked under a thin facade of politically correct nationalism would be so prevalent in 2014. I myself am a White American of Anglo descent, and I have no problem with non Whites. I live in a mostly Japanese American town with one black guy and plenty of Irish Americans and a few Jewish Americans. The black guy is a law abiding citizen, and aside his vernacular accent, is culturally indistinguishable from.most White guys. Many of the Japanese second generationals have way higher levels of intelligence than I do, and I am a MENSA member.

    What I do not get is why far right conservatives such as you folk must always bring race or ethnicity into the equation. Why can’t you just focus on preserving traditional American culture without being anti-non-White-immigration or racist?

    I do respect your right to freedom of the press, but I will ask that you substantiate your viewpoints with facts rather than just attacking Liberals.

    • Dota says:

      We do focus on the preservation of western values but sadly, that can’t be accomplished without preserving the White and Anglo Saxon character of North American societies.

      Let me ask you this instead. Suppose Mumbai was half white and that white half spoke fluent Marathi and Hindi. Let’s assume these white Mumbaikars also have a high birthrate and would soon displace Marathi Indians as the dominant majority. If Mumbai ever became dominated by Marathi speaking whites, would other Indians accept them as Indian? I think not. This is because their collective memories and experiences are rooted outside India. Try the analogy with Shanghai or Tokyo.

      We don’t have a problem with non whites really, our grievances are directed against the traitorous WASP and Jewish elites that would sell out Western civilization for a few worldly shekels. They are the ones that responsible for our suicidal immigration policy, gender bending feminist lunacy, and post modernism.

      • Peace Loving Whitey says:

        But understand that the United States is sitting on land that never belonged to White Europeans. The United States was always a multicultural country, and at one period in time the amount of blacks in the Confederate States outnumbered the amount of white residents. Remember that several of our states were recently annexed from Mexico, and that Native Americans were wrongly forced off their land. I can understand keeping Europe a white run coalition of nations, but America and Canada are two different stories.

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        The United States was always a multicultural country

        Not exactly.

        The U.S. has always had diversity, but for most of its history it was not “multicultural” in the sense that liberals use the word today. In fact, very few societies even today are “multicultural.”

        Check out this post on the differences between diversity and “multiculturalism.”

        https://occidentinvicta.com/2013/12/23/diversity-and-its-discontents-the-significant-differences-between-diversity-and-multiculturalism/

        We don’t advocate deporting all non-white people and recognize that creating a homogenous white state is no longer feasible at this point. However, we do believe in the maintenance of a white majority (even if it’s not an overwhelming one) as well as promoting the white character of our societies.

        I must say that your whole statement regarding the theft of American Indian land is mighty white of you. I don’t see too many other peoples acting like their people have no right to their nations on account of the historical conquests of their ancestors. For example, I don’t see many Turks saying that they should give Istanbul (formerly Constantinople) back to the Greeks.

        The way I see it, it’s a little silly to make a moral argument that today’s immigration policy should be based on righting historical conquests. Today’s white people shouldn’t be denied the right to national sovereignty and border regulation just because a few of their ancestors did some naughty things.

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        Nevertheless, I have been enjoying this stimulating conversation. You’re so far one of the few people who can disagree with us in a civil manner.

      • Peace Loving Whitey says:

        At one point in time the amount of African-Americans outnumbered Whites in the soon to be Confederate States.

        The thing is, Greeks have a state. Native Americans are essentially a stateless people. What White nation would want to relocate to a reservation? And why are you trying to brush off American Indian Genocide as insignificant because of its occurrence in the past rather than in the present? Native Americans deserve a nation. Can you give it to them?

        I understand that you do not want to deport all non-White people. But attempting to staunch non White immigration or attempting to prevent a non White group from becoming a majority is immoral. They have just as much of a right to this land as you do. All the Whites here were descendants of immigrants, and the majority of Whites can trace their ancestry to latter immigrants, while the majority of African-Americans can trace their ancestry back to prior inhabitants.

        You act as if the prescence of non-Whites in America threatens your existence. While black Americans do commit the vast majority of interracial crimes, like I stated earlier most of them were here before most of you. If you don’t like it go back to Europe. The alternative would be akin to an extraterrestrial asking Earthlings to go to Mars because Earthlings commit more interspecial crimes against E.T.s than vice versa. Blacks were here first.

        As for the other groups, such as East Asians; their crime rates are lower than the White crime rate. They have contributed to American history, they have a legitimate claim to the States.

        Texas used to belong to the Native American ancestors of today’s Mexicans. The Anglo pioneers took over and seceeded from Mexico to the States. Mexico didn’t like that so they rightfully fought to get their land back. They lost, U.S took Arizona, CA, Nevada, and NM. And now you are worried about the Mexicans in those states taking your jobs? Good! Let them. If they charge cheaper then you have been outcompeted. It is not their fault, they merely competed with you and won.

        I am not a Jew. I am pureblood WASP and trace my ancestry prior to Ellis Island. I am not some “Whimpy White” either. I have been in my fair share of street fights and I have emerged victorious the overwhelming majority of those times. I am not afraid to speak my mind either. I do not feel the need to apologize to anyone for slavery or colonialism, but I do feel the need to put greedy White Nationalists in their place.

        I have no objections to White Nationalists in Europe.

      • Dota says:

        The thing is, Greeks have a state. Native Americans are essentially a stateless people. What White nation would want to relocate to a reservation? And why are you trying to brush off American Indian Genocide as insignificant because of its occurrence in the past rather than in the present? Native Americans deserve a nation. Can you give it to them?

        Native Americans never had a nation to begin with, they were oblivious to the very concept of nation. This certainly does not excuse the atrocities they suffered over the centuries but which race is pure? The old world is full of examples of conquest and ethnic cleansing. What makes western crimes more abhorrent than the rest?

        I understand that you do not want to deport all non-White people. But attempting to staunch non White immigration or attempting to prevent a non White group from becoming a majority is immoral.

        Really? It’s immoral to defend the national identity of your nation? It’s immoral to resist the ethnic displacement of your people? Gee, that must make Japan, China, India, Israel, pretty much the entire world immoral.

        You act as if the prescence of non-Whites in America threatens your existence.

        Yes it does. They bring along alien values that are antithetical to the Protestant values that have shaped the US and Canada. In small numbers these non whites may assimilate and live in peace, but in large numbers, they threaten the fabric of North American society. Especially when Whites practice universalism while these people cling onto tribal interests.

        While black Americans do commit the vast majority of interracial crimes, like I stated earlier most of them were here before most of you.

        Blacks and Native Americans/Aboriginals are not the problem as they are as American as their white counterparts. Immigrants are the problem and we’ve drawn that distinction quite clearly throughout this website.

        I am pureblood WASP and trace my ancestry prior to Ellis Island.

        I’m sure your ancestors would be proud to see their progeny cheer on their own ethnic demise.

  4. I am not actually convinced that the Native-Americans were here first. I realize that has been the conventional wisdom but new discoveries dispute that. I am speaking, of course, of the Solutreans. I understand the Discovery channel has an excellent DVD (Ice Age Columbus) in that regard and I have heard the topic seriously discussed on the Science channel and the National Geographic channel, although they used the term Paleo-Indians instead, but make the connection to Europe. What I find intriguing is Native-American lore among many tribes (the Paiute is one) that speak of a tall, redheaded, group of people that preceded their arrival in North America.

    Regardless, however, I am an Ethno-Statist and believe in granting Native-Americans self- autonomous rule, and in time complete independence. I live by the mantra; self-determination for all and enforced diversity, or inclusion, for none! Anything you cannot leave voluntarily is a cult. I think secession is the last resort against government tyranny and the wave of the future will be political devolution and secession.

    People are not sovereign if they no longer control their destiny and whites in North America lost control of their destiny decades ago to a globalist cabal of elite insiders.In that case being a numerical majority profits us noting if said majority has lost control of its destiny. In such a case voting is mere illusion, in which case Marx had it wrong, it is not religion that is the opiate of the modern world, its voting! After all, what is Liberal-democracy but the facade behind which Plutocracy (and globalism) rules?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s