The Left And Racial Tensions – What Globalists Gain From Racial Chaos

When Palestinians are lectured on the horrors of the Holocaust, they react with a great deal of outrage. It isn’t for the reasons you think – they are outraged because they are expected to feel sympathy for the very same people that are currently subjecting them to ethnic cleansing. Similarly, when attacks like the latest incident in Nice transpire, Westerners react with outrage. Again, it isn’t for the reasons you think. Their primary source of outrage stems from being told to sympathize with the multiculturalism and diversity status quo in the face of horrific Islamist atrocities. We can expect to see a lot more of the following: terrorist/Micah Johnson attacks followed by the media rousing up public outrage against the atrocities which is responded to by a feckless call to continue respecting Multiculturalism and diversity.

There is a two prong strategy at work here. When a society is under attack, people expect their leaders take up a strong stand against the perpetrators if only to save face. One reason why India’s Narendra Modi is so popular is because of his perceived hard-line stance on Pakistan. This is not the man (according to public opinion) that adopts a conciliatory approach in the face of attack; he fights back. If he failed to do this, he would lose face (disastrous in Asia) and the public’s opinion regarding Pakistan would be further inflamed. Similarly, Westerners expect their leaders to take a stand when their societies are under attack; especially when the media rouses up passions with graphic content. When leaders (deliberately) fail to assuage the trauma of the public, the latter’s passions are further inflamed against what they perceive are troublesome minorities.  Blacks and Muslims for their part are also incensed at (what they perceive) is a media war against them. It would seem that the majority and certain minorities are being pitted against each other. What could our globalist elites possibly gain from such a scenario? I believe that North America is being molded along the paradigm of Pakistan. Let’s examine this thesis.

The dilemma of diversity

The rationale behind the creation of Pakistan was to provide South Asia’s Muslims with a safe haven. It must be stated that a large number of Indian Muslims cannot relate to Pakistan due to cultural and linguistic differences. I have yet to meet a single Tamil or Keralite Pakistani. The Tamil and Keralite Muslims of south India predictably feel closer bonds of kinship to their Hindu neighbours who share their language, cuisine, and culture. What the architects of Pakistan failed to account for were the cultural and language differences that separate the various ethnic groups in western India. Due to irreconcilable cultural differences, the Bengalis in the east separated from Pakistan and formed Bangladesh in 1971. Memories of the genocide they endured in the early 70s are still alive and fresh today. Pakistan has failed to address the underlying issues of national identity and racial solidarity that led to the Bangladesh crisis. Even today, street skirmishes between rival ethnic groups like the Pasthuns and Muhajirs are common in cities like Karachi. The Sindhis despise the Punjabis and the Balochis want out of Pakistan altogether.

The only force keeping this disunited and dysfunctional “country” together is the Pakistani army. It was the Pakistani army (with Iran’s help) that suppressed the Balochi uprising in the 1950s and continues to militarily dominate Baluchistan. India (also blessed with diversity) faces similar problems. The Indian army (in conjunction with a brutal police force) ruthlessly quashes any signs of uprising in places like Kashmir and Assam. The truly stable societies in Asia are ethnically homogeneous – Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore.

Keeping diversity functioning in environments with scarce resources (like most third world nations) requires a strong state with totalitarian proclivities. Diversity is the very anti-thesis for anti-nationalism. As I’ve written previously, globalists have a strong aversion to traditionalist forces like nationalism, family, culture and religion because they hinder the free flow of capital. Diversity eats away nationalism like Sulfuric acids eats away human skin. It’s no coincidence then that the Chinese have been sending in a steady flow of han immigrants into Tibet. Nationalism dies when a nationalist’s aspirations are rejected by his neighbours.

Turning our attention back to North America, let’s examine the following chart.

militarization

The data clearly indicates that advanced police militarization is observed in Florida and NY on the East Coast, the U.S south, and finally California on the West coast. What do these regions have in common? The relatively homogeneous Midwest seems to host the least amount of police militarization. One of the horrors of the Micah Johnson shooting was that he was taken out with a robot rigged with explosives. The implications of this are enormous, yet few can rise above the sewer that is the culture war and see the writing on the wall.

As the West slowly but surely marches towards economic collapse, we can expect ethnic tensions to flare up as various groups skirmish with each other in a competition for scarce resources. The left (the mouthpiece of Globalist ideology) will continue to fan the flames of war with race agitation like BLM. The only thing that will keep the U.S. functioning as a country in such a scenario would be a militarized force backed by a State with totalitarian proclivities. Welcome to Pakistan.

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Asia, China, Cultural Marxism, Race and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Left And Racial Tensions – What Globalists Gain From Racial Chaos

  1. Ezra Pound says:

    “The rationale behind the creation of Pakistan was to provide South Asia’s Muslims with a safe haven.” – No. The British created Pakistan for the same reason that they pursued a policy of continental “balance” for 400 years: divide and conquer. They created Pakistan as an “anti-India” in order to make sure that no single strong nation emerged on the territory of Empire’s ex-jewel to successfully challenge “British” (i.e., Judeo-Masonic) pretensions to hegemony. The Ukraine is another example of an anti-nation (an anti-Russia in this case) created purely ad hoc to divide and conquer.

    • Dota says:

      What I meant was, the stated reason behind the creation of Pakistan. This reason was intended for mass consumption.

    • Mawlana87 says:

      Ezra is right. Pakistan despite claiming to be “the last fortress of Islam” is like a cancer for the region and for Islam itself: they have systematically butchered Muslims all over the region, whether by their own hand (Bangladesh, Waziristan and Baluchistan) or through proxy forces (Haqqani Network, Hezb-e Islami and SHura Quetta in Afghanistan, Lashkar Taiba in India,.. and so on). No wonder they are surrounded by hostile neighbors. Nobody likes them.

      Regarding USA, the odds of becoming Pakistan 2.0 are far fetched (for now). Nor USA neither Europe are going to collapsed economically in the near future. West still will have a huge influence in the world affairs for many decades. With all due respect, this article, despite making some good points, its pure fear mongering. The most advanced countries in the world are ethnically and culturally diverse: GCC (immigrants make up 80% of the population), USA, Europe,.. and so on. So I am not buying this.

      • Dota says:

        Regarding USA, the odds of becoming Pakistan 2.0 are far fetched (for now). Nor USA neither Europe are going to collapsed economically in the near future. West still will have a huge influence in the world affairs for many decades.

        I didn’t say that it would happen overnight, but this seems to be the trajectory our elites have set us on.

        The most advanced countries in the world are ethnically and culturally diverse: GCC

        This is an invalid comparison. I’ve lived in Dubai for over 10 years and visited other GCC countries. They have laws in place that protect the dominant status of their Arab citizens. They might be diverse due to economic necessity, but they are certainly not multicultural. The Arabs are in charge and they certainly don’t let anybody forget it.

  2. Mawlana87 says:

    “The Arabs are in charge and they certainly don’t let anybody forget it.”

    So.. you mean that in Western countries white people but minorities are in charge? With all due respect, brother, but that makes no sense. Lefties/liberals have always used minorities in order to advance their anti-Western agenda. They care as long as it benefits their anti-White, anti-West, anti-straight and anti-Christian agenda. But at the end of the day they are Westerners.

    BTW I did not say “multicultural” but “diverse”. Multiculturalism is a Western phenomenon.

    “I didn’t say that it would happen overnight, but this seems to be the trajectory our elites have set us on.”

    Brother, through History that has been a common pattern: those who ruled the world, eventually became weak and fell apart. Its a universal law: what goes up must eventually come down.

    • Dota says:

      But at the end of the day they are Westerners.

      They are globalists. They have no loyalty to race, nation, sex, or religion.

      BTW I did not say “multicultural” but “diverse”. Multiculturalism is a Western phenomenon.

      Diversity is a weakness. The GCC countries aren’t advanced in any sense of the word. They are actually pretty backward societies with modern infrastructure. The truly advanced societies of Asia (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan) are largely homogeneous.

  3. Beatrix says:

    America’s Descent Into Madness By Henry A. Giroux, CounterPunch
    Posted on Aug 19, 2013
    “Different stories, ones that provided a sense of history, social responsibility, and respect for the public good, were once circulated by our parents, churches, synagogues, schools, and community leaders. Today, the stories that define who we are as individuals and as a nation are told by right-wing and liberal media that broadcast the conquests of celebrities, billionaires, and ethically frozen politicians who preach the mutually related virtues of the free market and a permanent war economy.”

    http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/americas_descent_into_madness_20130819

    Interesting article.
    I thought things were bad in the US, but I didn’t think it would get THIS bad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s