The stereotype of the effete and henpecked Jewish husband is an old one. Interestingly enough, there are several examples of henpecked husbands in the Old Testament. Abraham, who was henpecked by his shrewish wife Sarah, was compelled to abandon Hagar and her son Ishmael to perish in the desert. Ahab was henpecked by his wife Jezebel to rebel and sin against God. I haven’t the foggiest idea of what accounts for Jewish wimpiness but I have observed that Jewish men share certain traits in common with women in general.
If there is but one word that so flawlessly describes both Jew and Woman it is this. Modern western women are famously solipsistic and live through contradictions without even being aware of them. They are “strong and independent” but yet always the “victim. ” They are “empowered” but still fantasize about Christian Grey types. They claim they don’t need a man but are still content to live on his charity (Alimony, Child support). You get the idea. Jewish men likewise are also solipsistic. They genuinely believe that their influence on the world is positive and that antisemitism is completely irrational. The Jew sincerely believes that the goyim should love him for inundating the latter’s society with Feminism, Porn, Hollywood, and Cultural Marxism. H.G Wells said it best: “A careful study of anti-Semitism, prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritation they inflict”
The following quote by Alan Dershowitz illustrates Jewish solipsism in all it’s glory:
“How does one understand — not even forgive, simply understand! — the virulently anti-Jewish statements of intellectuals throughout history? Their numbers included H. L. Mencken (‘The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of’); George Bernard Shaw (‘Stop being Jews and start being human beings’); Henry Adams (‘The whole rotten carcass is rotten with Jew worms’); H.G. Wells (‘A careful study of anti-Semitism, prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritation they inflict’); Edgar Degas (characterized as a ‘wild anti-Semite’); Denis Diderot (‘Brutish people, vile and vulgar men’); Theodore Dreiser (New York is a ‘kike’s dream of a ghetto,’ and Jews are not ‘pure Americans’ and ‘lack integrity’); T. S. Eliot (a social as well as literary anti-Semite, even after the Holocaust); Immanuel Kant (‘The Jews still cannot claim any true genius, any truly great man. All their talents and skills revolve around stratagems and low cunning … They are a nation of swindlers.’) Other famous anti-Semites include Tacitus, Cicero, Aleksander Pushkin, Pierre Renoir, Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and, of course, Richard Wagner. This honor roll of anti-Jewish bigotry goes on, and included people of every race, religion, and geographic area, political leaning, gender, and age. The answer to the question why? probably lies more in the realm of abnormal psychology than in any rational attempts to find understandable cause in history, or economics. Anti-Semitism is a disease of the soul, and diseases are best diagnosed by examining those infected with them (Dershowitz, Alan. Chutzpah. Little, Brown, and Co. Boston, Toronto, London, 1991; p 113).”
That the Jew’s propensity to provoke antisemitism wherever he goes does not give him pause to critically reflect on his behavior. No, antisemitism HAS to be irrational! While Jewry routinely deconstruct European identities, their own identity will always remain off-limits. Henry Ford once observed that while Jews were used to a certain amount of xenophobia, they were very threatened when their Jewish identity itself was critically examined. The Jews wish for North Americans to see them as ordinary whites who practice a different religion, and not as a nation within a nation. Or worse, a fifth column for Israel.
To borrow an analogy from Bay Area Guy: If a man gets kicked out of a bar, no one makes much of it. However, if this same guy gets kicked out of every bar he visits, you begin to wonder. The Jewish tendency to binge on the sound of their own voice while shutting out others is a very female characteristic.
The media never fails to remind us that Jews remain the reigning Gold medalists in the Oppression Olympics. Jews wear their victimhood on their sleeve and ruthlessly compete with other victim groups to maintain their position on top of the victim pyramid.
The only other group that plays the victim card as religiously happens to be women. Like today’s modern woman that whines about “males privilege” while remaining oblivious to her many privileges, the Jews routinely abuse their disproportionate power by silencing critics while genuinely believing themselves to being the victims. I suspect this trait is the origin of the stereotype that Jews lack manliness. The Canadian Museum for Human rights is basically a temple dedicated to Jewish Victimhood worship. Like Jezebel and Lady Macbeth, the Jews can affect nothing save through the influence they wield upon powerful figures among the goyim. The Jews never confront their foes head on, but rather prefer to subvert, cajole, and manipulate. Just as Herod was manipulated by his queen and daughter to murder John the Baptist, the Jew is likewise nothing without the Saxon tools at his disposal. The Jewish alliance with turncoat Saxon elites is not an equal one. Jewry uses wealth and influence but agency is exercised at the discretion of said turncoat elites. I’ve often wondered if this is why American porn is saturated with scenes of Jewish men copulating with blonde gentile females. That the Jew is trying to convince himself that HE is the masculine one in this relationship. But that is just a speculation.
I’m not sure why Jewish men are less masculine but I think it’s certainly an area worth looking into.