Saving the Children While Losing Your Nation: Immigrant Children, Imperialism, and Irresponsible Elitism

It’s no secret that the United States is plagued with “child worship,” as noted by both historian Richard Hofstadter (not in those words) and the always acerbic George Carlin. No matter how foolish or shortsighted any policy or program may be, it can always count on enjoying success or at least sympathy by invoking the latest group of future social media addicts. The latest imbroglio over illegal immigration is a perfect illustration of this principle.

Image

Children, of course, are the perfect tool to further facilitate massive demographic changes and the future displacement of white Americans. After all, who can object to alleviating the plight of children? Only a monstrous racist, of course. Those white American protesters who confronted buses of illegal immigrant children might as well whip out the bed sheets and burning crosses. There can be no quarter given or mercy shown to those who would thwart attempts to resolve such a “humanitarian crisis.”

No decent human being wishes any of these Central American kids ill will. However, at some point, human love and sentimental beliefs must take a backseat to group interest. After all, there are hundreds of millions of children all over the world who suffer from some combination of poverty, violence, or instability. Are Western nations such as the United States required to accept all of them as well? Are majority white countries under some moral obligation to turn their countries into giant soup kitchens and amusement parks just so the brown masses of the world can “enjoy a better life?” The great and late Gore Vidal, not exactly an evil white nationalist, had some thoughts on the folly of mass immigration (I highly recommend reading the whole article):

“A characteristic of our present chaos is the dramatic migration of tribes. They are on the move from east to west, from south to north. Liberal tradition requires that borders must always be open to those in search of safety or even the pursuit of happiness. But now with so many millions of people on the move, even the great-hearted are becoming edgy. Norway is large enough and empty enough to take in 40 to 50 million homeless Bengalis. If the Norwegians say that, all in all, they would rather not take them in, is this to be considered racism? I think not. It is simply self-preservation, the first law of species.”

Unrestricted open borders is sheer lunacy, and it appears that growing numbers of white people, both here and internationally, are collectively beginning to say “enough is enough!” All the hackneyed emotional appeals about how humans aren’t illegal, we’re all immigrants, and these people just want to feed their families, are beginning to lose their impact. So when all else fails, it’s time to bring in the children!

Now again, I’m hardly saying that I want these children to be sent back to be killed, raped, or otherwise harmed by psychotic drug gangs and other violent elements. In fact, I feel that there is a better way to mitigate the suffering of these children than allowing them to flood our already overburdened nation. Why don’t our debased elites actually put some good ol’ fashioned American intervention to some genuinely moral use? Why doesn’t the U.S. deploy troops to Central America with the sole moral purpose of squashing gangs like MS-13? Or how about ending the foolish “war on drugs,” which hasn’t quelled America’s appetite for drugs, but instead allowed increasingly powerful and violent drug cartels to fill in the void? Even better, perhaps the U.S. can refrain from supporting coups that further destabilize Latin American nations, only to then reward the new brutal regimes with aid. By reducing the violence and instability that has prompted these kids to move north, Central American nations would be more secure and safe for children. The angry white Americans in Murrieta would likewise have no more cause for frustration.

But of course, our elites will do no such thing. They’re not actually interested in improving the livelihoods of impoverished 3rd world nations or their own citizens who look like them. One only needs to observe how they endorse the debilitating brain drain. In the same way that feminism has merely augmented the power of male elites at the expense of everyday men, the same holds true for mass immigration. Even though it is our amoral elites who have fomented instability and exploitative conditions in Central America, it is everyday white Americans who will have to foot the bill in the form of greater social tension, job competition, and creeping displacement in the form of mass non-white immigration.

It’s time to face some difficult truths. If our elites really wanted to, they could virtually suppress immigration overnight. Hell, they’re always capable of bringing American power to bear when it comes to invading and occupying godforsaken Middle Eastern and Central Asian shitholes that most Americans couldn’t locate on a map. They certainly have no problem with providing Israel aid so that they can defend their own ethnic borders. And yet we’re being told that immigration is simply inevitable? Give us a break.

At the end of the day, they only care about cheap labor, votes, and further leverage over the average man. Democrats and Republicans alike are not interested in helping white Americans. Therefore, I wouldn’t hold my breath during this supposed conflict over “immigration reform.”

Advertisements
Aside | This entry was posted in Economics, Hispanics, Immigration, Race, Subversion and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Saving the Children While Losing Your Nation: Immigrant Children, Imperialism, and Irresponsible Elitism

  1. Tulio says:

    What really irritates me is the way the word “immigrant” has been so cheapened. Immigration used to actually mean something. Somebody would go through the legal process of coming here, want to learn English, want to be an American and assimilate into the culture and be productive. These children are being called immigrants but what they really are is refugees more accurately. When you are getting swamped with tens of thousands of destitute people fleeing another country in mass, this is a REFUGEE crisis. Is it just political correctness that’s stops the media from saying this? Because “immigrant” wins more hearts than refugees? Now anyone that shows up on our doorstep is an immigrant. Just crossing someone’s border doesn’t make you an immigrant. And if they do it in large numbers and don’t assimilate, then they are basically colonists. The southwest is slowly turning into a de facto colony of Mexico. The further south you go it gets hard to tell where the USA ends and Mexico begins. Their sheer numbers and political clout has allowed illegals to get driver licenses, enroll in college with in-state tuition, get professional licenses. It won’t be long before illegals are allowed to serve as judges or politicians.

    It’s a ashamed to see people angry at children like this, but after decades of nothing being done about this illegal immigration situation, how can you not expect resentment to boil over. People have had enough. It would be one thing if it was a very small number of people coming here illegal, but we’re talking 10-20 million in the country illegal. From what I’ve read, 1 in 10 California residents is illegal.

    • Bay Area Guy says:

      Precisely.

      As I’ve said before, when immigration is small in scale and properly regulated, then it can provide necessary workers and even a degree of cultural enrichment.

      However, when immigration becomes completely untrammeled and is accompanied by a multiculturalist ideology that’s hostile towards assimilation, then immigration starts to look and feel more like an invasion.

  2. Bo Sears says:

    I’d like to see an extension of your idea for taking it back to the sending countries. This occasion causes so many dangers to the children riding freight trains to US borders, that the sending countries should be accused of child endangerment, human trafficking, child abuse, and failure to render due assistance to their young. Then send a gunboat or two to take over the money from tariffs, taxes, and criminal gains by their oligarchs and apply the money to housing, feeding, employing, and educating these youth. We could even go so far as to employ a version of the Monroe Doctrine to claim a protectorate status over those countries until they shape up.

    We must direct attention toward the sending countries mistreating their youngsters, and away from the mushy idea that the US has an obligation toward these mistreated children.

  3. Tulio says:

    Glenn Beck, who is far-right is now doing the “save the children” thing on the border. Watch the video: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/09/glenn-beck-border-event_n_5570926.html

    • Bay Area Guy says:

      “Anyone, left or right, seeking political gain at the expense of these desperate, vulnerable, poor and suffering people are reprehensible, and they should be reminded that it has been said ‘whoever represses the poor shows contempt for their maker,'”

      Unbelievable. Yet further proof, as if more were needed, that mainstream white conservatives are either completely useless or elitist tools. It’s amazing how someone who represents the interest of large corporations and economic vampires now has the audacity to lecture us about not repressing the poor.

      Just like white liberals, he seems to care more about poor foreigners than impoverished native born people who look just like them.

      What a shameful spectacle. Beck is not the only one. Billionaire and fanatic Zionist Sheldon Adelson likewise has come out in support of amnesty, telling Republicans to show “compassion.” Too bad he doesn’t extend such compassion towards the Palestinians.

      Every average white conservative should see this. The Republicans are not their friend. Not only do they screw them over economically, but they’ve proven to be completely feckless on the various social issues that actually motivate them to vote Republican.

  4. Pingback: Robert Stark interviews Bay Area Guy - The STARK TRUTH with Robert Stark

  5. Pingback: Robert Stark interviews Bay Area Guy – robertstarkradio

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s