Too Big and Non-White to Oppose: China and Postcolonial Selective Outrage

I’m going to do something radical and completely out of character; I’m going to cut Zionist Jews and Israel some slack! You heard me right. Is it because I’ve come to embrace organized Jewry and Israel? Is it because I somehow believe that Israel is in fact not guilty of its various crimes against humanity? No and no. I’m doing it because liberal Zionists are actually correct when they insist that the far left and various Social Justice Warriors are hypocrites when they single out Israel for special condemnation. I guess the blind squirrel can find the nut every now and then.

SJW’s and our current liberal elites have always had a funny relationship with colonialism. Whenever any white nation or group of people controls or settles a territory, however small in scale, then they become forever tainted with the original sin of colonialism. Just look at Sweden.

Social Justice Warrior

However, non-white nations are seldom denounced for the crime of colonialism, no matter how severe or grand in scale their oppressive endeavors were. Former non-white imperialists such as the Turks and Japanese (just to name a couple) have been able to, more or less, fade into obscurity. Sure, some Armenians will fume about Turkey, while Japan’s historical amnesia and lack of tact have occasionally provoked the ire of China and South Korea. However, few people insist that nations such as Turkey and Japan must open their borders, embrace multiculturalism, and surrender their identities in order to atone for past crimes.

Or present crimes. As I currently write this post, the non-Western countries of Israel and China are currently engaging in colonial settler enterprises, oppressing and displacing the native populations in the process. However, among leftist talking heads in the West, Israel is the nation that has been the most excoriated. All right! At last, Jews are finally being called out for their questionable moral hypocrisy and held to the same standards as white gentiles! Well, not quite. The reason why Israel-Palestine has become a pet cause among many social justice activists is simply because it fits the narrative of evil whites colonizing and displacing poor brown people. Many within the movement have highlighted the whiteness of Israelis and lumped Zionism in with old fashioned white supremacy. Others such as Ali Abunimah have also gone out of their way to protect Jews as a group from censure and bring down the hammer on anyone who criticizes Jews collectively. He likewise insists that the struggle isn’t against Jews, but European colonial settler movements (ie. evil white people). I guarantee you that if the original Zionist Jews who perpetrated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians were Middle Eastern Mizrahim as opposed to white Ashkenazim, few people on the left would give a crap.

Meanwhile, while China continues to colonize and exploit the traditional homeland of the Uighurs, there’s a significant dearth of outrage. Of course, there are other possible explanations for this lack of attention aside from the usual leftist hypocrisy. Xinjiang/East Turkestan isn’t located in the birthplace of Christianity, and thus doesn’t command as much attention from everyday white Americans. Another possibility is that in today’s post 9/11 climate, the fact that Uighurs are wicked Mooslims could contribute to the West’s apathy on this issue. Unlike the Tibetans who are regarded as peaceful Buddhists with lovable figureheads such as the Dalai Lama, Uighurs arouse no such sympathy. However, even the Tibetans have fallen on hard times lately, and are increasingly resorting to self-immolations to attract the attention of a world that has more or less turned a blind eye to China’s repression of its minority groups.

Perhaps China has simply become too big and powerful to oppose. Likewise, since the Chinese haven’t imbibed white peoples’ notion of guilt, social justice, and self-flagellation in relation to minority groups, maybe leftists know better than to play that game with China. Despite their radical posturing, social justice activists have always shied away from confronting any possibly challenging adversary, preferring instead to go after low-hanging fruit. Stephen Sniegoski nailed their mindset to a tee when he described the kind of Israel lobby denial exhibited in that counterpunch editorial (bold emphasis mine):

“The antiwar Left would prefer that old-style American imperialism and the quest for oil had caused the Iraq War. They are the preferred enemies of the Left. They are the traditional villains. And they are safe villains. Mentioning Israel as a culprit would cause problems: it would lose support for the Left among activist Jews, and it would lead to hostility from the Israel lobby and mainstream Jewish groups.

By way of contrast, no one ever got in trouble berating oil magnates or Arab sheiks — witness Michael Moore’s blockbuster 2004 documentary, “Fahrenheit 9/11,” which focuses on those alleged villains while ignoring the neocon/Israel connection to the war. [1] Also important is the fact that Jews, categorically, are considered to be victims; and it is hard for the Left to criticize an officially recognized victim group. In terms of left-wing psychology the ideal is to strike a radical, nonconformist pose without really alienating the powerful, thus avoiding any negative consequences as well as the cognitive dissonance that results from chiding designated victims.”

Criticizing “white supremacy” is easy. Attacking white racism ceased being courageous after 1968, and no powerful lobbies or special interest groups will threaten someone’s livelihood for critiquing white people. However, to criticize Jews collectively would invite a torrent of pressure and outrage from powerful groups such as the ADL. Similarly, to stridently critique Chinese colonialism and aggressively deconstruct Chinese culture in relation to its crimes would be too risky and dangerous. God forbid that they be tarred as “orientalists” or “racists.”

The lessons for whites and pro-Western activists from this is that our enemies, like all human beings, ultimately respect power and self-assertion. Therefore, I implore white people to stop apologizing and end these obsequious displays of prostration over historical Western crimes. And for God’s sake, stop fearing the dreaded R word as you would a feral pit bull. The way white people react so defensively to being accused of racism, you’d think someone had called them a serial killer or child molester. As we have repeatedly emphasized on this blog, be tactful while also holding your ground. Don’t fall for their game.

Meanwhile, don’t expect China to be held accountable for “Han supremacy” and “Han privilege” anytime soon.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Asia, China, Cultural Marxism, Israel, Jewry, Racism, Subversion, Wimpy Whites and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Too Big and Non-White to Oppose: China and Postcolonial Selective Outrage

  1. Not Optimistic says:

    What is really going to be interesting is the social justice types’ reaction to China’s creeping colonization of Africa. It’s still in its early stages, but has potential to get really big and transformative.

    • Bay Area Guy says:

      The thing about China is that while it’s certainly an imperialist nation and bully in its own right, China (both historically and today) has never really harbored overseas colonial ambitions.

      They’ve never tried to conquer the world, but can be quite aggressive in their own neighborhood, as evidenced by their behavior towards the Uighurs, Tibetans, Vietnamese, etc.

      The Chinese will use “soft power” in Africa. They’ll provide dictators with nice gifts such as mansions and stadiums, they’ll sell their cheap crap, and in turn they’ll quietly extract Africa’s natural resources. Africans, to their credit, don’t seem too blind to this, as many have expressed anger or apprehension over creeping Chinese economic colonization.

      • Bruce says:

        I hope they change and go full imperialist. A Chinese-Russian alliance to dominate the world is the only real alternative to the Zionist Occupied West on the on hand, and the nascent (Sunni-)Islamic Caliphate that, I predict, will be one of the world’s largest states in 10 years or less.

      • Jonathan says:

        on the on hand, and the nascent (Sunni-)Islamic Caliphate that, I predict, will be one of the world’s largest states in 10 years or less.

        Then predict a doom….. For all their history, arab would go back to stone age if these caliphates take over

      • Actually the narrative they say is racist towards Levantines. They emphasize and act like everyone is brown and poor when that isn’t the case. Christians from the Levant score higher on all of the educational exams than all other religions there. I suppose families like the Sununus or the Naders are taken as nonwhite in the US. Someone from a family that was wealthy and educated during the Ottoman era, often people descended from early wave immigrants, will take offense at the current narrative because they view a lot of the people left behind as trash their families would never associate with. Why should someone of this background be leftist when their families were part of the rich?

      • Cyrus says:

        I don’t know, man…They are weaponizing like nothing I’ve seen before. They may use soft power over seas, but if there interests are threatened, such as what happened in Libya in 2010-11, I am certain they intend to “project,” especially after 2025 or so.

        View story at Medium.com

        Of course, the whole world is sort of moving in that direction to some extent…

      • Huax says:

        The Uighur are not native to Xinjiang. The modern day Uighur speak a dialect of the Karluk Turkic language. The Uighur of the 700s spoke Orkhon. They were a Siberian, fully-Mongoloid people. Geneticists have found no “direct links” between the Tocharians and the modern-day Uighur.

        The first time today’s Uighur arrived in Xinjiang was in the mid 1600s, and even then they were only the lowest classes in a multi-ethnic Mongol Empire that reached at most the very Western fringe of what is today Xinjiang.

        China had established itself by at least 60 BC.

  2. Cyrus says:

    Great article. I’ve always found the “Hollywood” obsession with all things Tibet, and the total lack of empathy for the Uighurs and other minority groups in China, to be rather amusing.

    You’re also right about Israel…If it had been formed purely out of “Arabic” Middle Eastern Jews, I don’t there would be much uproar. Just one “brown” Middle Eastern country fighting with another. Sort of like Iran and Iraq, or Armenia and Azerbaijan, India and Pakistan(plenty of religious cleansing there), etc.

    • Bay Area Guy says:

      You’re also right about Israel…If it had been formed purely out of “Arabic” Middle Eastern Jews, I don’t there would be much uproar. Just one “brown” Middle Eastern country fighting with another.

      Yeah, in the eyes of most Americans, everyone from Morocco to Pakistan is part of some homogenous brown race.

      That’s probably why Uighurs get little to no empathy outside of nations such as Turkey. They’re Muslims and seen as just another Middle Eastern/Central Asian people/brown group of people. They certainly don’t inspire any real sympathy.

    • Huax says:

      Hollywood doesn’t have empathy for the Uighur because like most people in the West none of them knew they existed until a year ago. However the US actively funds Uighur terrorist groups.

  3. Pingback: The True Global Minority « Attack the System

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s