Pointing out the hypocrisy of Jews advocating liberal multicultural societies at home while either supporting or tacitly endorsing Jewish supremacy in Israel is nothing new. However, some news items related to this topic are so obscene that one cannot help but write about it from time to time. It is no secret that Israel despises the presence of non-Jews and will use various means to limit “demographic threats.” The latest threat to Israel’s Jewishness comes in the form of black African asylum seekers from Eritrea and Sudan. Israeli Jews make no effort to conceal their disdain for these newcomers, and would gladly rid themselves of these Africans. After trying various other means to expel black Africans, Israel has devised a new solution: Let Sweden have them.
Despite attempts by the Israeli Interior Ministry to take credit for this development, even claiming that they offered the asylum seekers financial benefits for leaving, the truth is a bit different:
“It’s not clear what the Interior Ministry take pride in. Sweden only resettles people with refugee status who are not afforded adequate protection in countries they find themselves in. The fact that Sweden took in 50 refugees proves yet again that Israel is the only country that doesn’t recognize Eritrean asylum seekers as refugees, and that other countries feel that Israel is not fulfilling its obligations under the Refugee Convention.”
So in other words, Sweden is only taking in refugees because Israel is doing everything in its power to make life as miserable as possible for these asylum seekers. The parasitical nature of Israel once again rears its head. Not only do they continue to accept billions in annual aid and push the United States to fight its wars, they’re now outsourcing unwelcome immigrants to Europe. However, in spite of massive strikes, protests, and growing international scrutiny, Israeli politicians insisted on kicking them out. Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar in particular had some choice words for business owners upset by the lost profit caused by striking Africans:
Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar said he was “not very impressed with all the crying and complaining” by business owners whose employees were on strike. “With all due respect to the restaurant and café owners in crisis, or those whose cleaning staff didn’t show up, this will not determine Israel’s national policy. On the contrary, let’s think about those Israelis who have lost their jobs [to migrant workers].”
As much as Israel goes overboard with its ethnonationalism, I sympathize with the sentiment. If only politicians in the West shared Sa’ar’s belief and opted to look after their people rather than caving in to corporate interests. This just goes to show that globalization and multiculturalism are not inevitable and natural outcomes, and that they can be stemmed if there is sufficient will and racial consciousness. I can’t really condemn Israel too much, in spite of its shameful displays. As someone who believes in immigration restriction, I understand Jews wanting to retain a Jewish majority within Israel, and it would be hypocritical for me to assert that Jews are wrong to close their borders to the masses of the third world or take measures to deport immigrants. I won’t sink to the level of duplicitous liberal Zionists.
(the native Palestinians and Israel’s attempts to exclude them are another story, but that’s neither here nor there)
What does perplex me, however, is why Sweden has volunteered to take in these black African migrants. Have they not learned their lesson? Do they really think that admitting a bunch of visibly different, unskilled immigrants who can’t speak their language is going to produce anything but tension, dysfunction, and perhaps future riots? I guess not, because earlier they granted blanket asylum to any and all Syrian refugees.
If you spend enough time reading leftists, you’ll discover their assertion that mass immigration and multiculturalism are natural and moral consequences of the crimes of colonialism. I don’t agree, but for former colonial powers such as Britain and France, I’ll grant their point for the sake of argument. If the leftists are correct in this regard, then why is it that non-imperialistic countries such as Sweden have to endure mass immigration and accept all the refugees of the world, while a warmongering and settler colonial society such as Israel is allowed to seal its borders and deport whomever they like?
In the end, there are no natural or inevitable reasons for multiculturalism. Countries that have committed far worse crimes than many European countries in the past century don’t tolerate multiculturalism or consciously dilute their identity in the name of atonement or diversity. Multicultural nonsense only exists because of a dire lack of racial consciousness among whites, which is only compounded by the sophisticated moral assaults on Western identity as demonstrated by Hamid Dabashi’s editorial. Whites simply need to cast aside quixotic and self-defeating ideologies.
Since we can’t save all whites at once, I say we start with the Swedes. For now, the best solution is to show the Swedish masses an old Viking film. Perhaps it will remind them that they weren’t always effete liberals.