Loyal readers of Occident Invicta might recall Dota’s short quiz designed to determine what constitutes a wimpy white person. It is known that wimpy whites not only repudiate their heritage, but even defend and sympathize with those who would do them harm. Such a craven attitude recently reared its head in the form of an insipid white woman named Phoebe Connolly. Connolly was the victim of what is known as the “knockout game,” or among many of the perpetrators, “polar bear hunting.” This exhilarating sport involves groups of “teens” (read: violent ghetto blacks) who go around randomly sucker punching primarily white individuals in mainly the American Northeast. Of course, like a good liberal white woman, she didn’t express any anger over the senseless violence she endured. While one could attribute her lack of anger over the incident to a positive outlook on life, her statement that her recent victimization was just further proof of the necessity of youth programs left me nonplussed. Sure, I’m not going to deny that growing up in an economically desolate ghetto can instill in people a certain sense of nihilism and frustration, which occasionally involves lashing out. Nonetheless, there’s simply no excuse for such behavior. Last time I checked, there are other means to relieve boredom. I guess sports, video games, television, booze, and weed just aren’t sufficient to quench the insatiable desire for excitement among certain segments of today’s youth.
These knockout incidents and the media responses illustrate the lack of fortitude and solidarity among white Americans. For starters, the CNN article, among many others, only bothers to scrutinize the racial motivations behind the attacks when the victims are Jewish. Never mind that white people as a whole are bearing the brunt of these attacks. Now, before we rush to blame the Jewish dominated media, what’s another possible reason for this double standard? Put simply, Jews embrace ethnic solidarity and are quick to rush to the defense of their group when attacked. How often do white gentiles speak out against attacks perpetrated against their group? How often do mainstream white figures openly denounce the racial motivations behind attacks against whites? As despicable as the media is, meaningful action against anti-white attacks can’t take place so long as vapid whites such as Phoebe Connolly continue to act as wimpy apologists for their attackers. Whites will not be galvanized into speaking out while the only ones who point out this egregious double standard are alternative right bloggers or corporate lackey Republican buffoons such as Rush Limbaugh.
So aside from a few conservative voices in the wilderness, whites simply aren’t exhibiting any real collective outrage. If Uighurs committed attacks against Han Chinese or Palestinians harmed Israeli Jews, the majorities in those respective countries would not hesitate to bring their troublesome minorities to heel. I’m not saying that the white West should lurch towards the other extreme, and readers know that I hold Israel in low esteem. However, the current extreme of white guilt and lack of racial solidarity is rather vexing. What accounts for this lack of pride and solidarity among whites? Kevin MacDonald and others would argue that the lack of extended kinship among Europeans resulted in a relative lack of collectivism and ethnocentrism. Yet much of this white wimpiness has mainly reared its head during the past few decades, and thus I’m somewhat skeptical of MacDonald’s evo psych explanations. Regardless of the reasons behind the relative lack of ethnocentrism among whites, it remains a frustrating problem.
However, since I’m in a good mood, I feel compelled to end this post on a positive note. In fact, I have ideas for readers on how to make a small dent in this liberal wall of wimpy, or even just have some fun. Considering that one of the latest victims of this knockout game was a white woman, and her attackers black men, I want you to put any white leftists you might encounter into a bind. Here are some methods that can place white liberals in quite the uncomfortable conundrum:
1. Bring up the fact that Connolly was a woman, and her attackers primarily young men. Once you have that established, deceptively assert that women are unsafe due to the prevalence of male violence. Be self-loathing if you have to.
2. If the white liberal agrees with your previous assertion, then proceed to discuss the racial element. Highlight the fact that the “knockout game” attackers are almost exclusively black, and you therefore don’t feel safe around groups of black men. If executed properly, the liberal will likely respond with disgust and accusations of racism.
3. Then, having incited the proper knee-jerk reaction, pull the ace out of your sleeve. Inform the wimpy white of his hypocrisy. How can he condemn whites fearing groups of blacks while simultaneously condoning women’s fear of men, all based on the actions of a few?
Prepare to be amused as the outraged and perplexed liberal tries to resolve this oppression olympics pissing contest in his head!