What a Real Supremacist Culture Looks Like: Racism Versus Majoritarianism

What even constitutes “racism” anymore? The word has been abused to the point of being rendered hackneyed, and still very few people actually take the time to reflect on what the word means. Dota and I subscribe to the classic definition of racism, which is espousing beliefs in the inherent superiority or inferiority of different groups of people, and assigning hierarchies based on these biological differences. However, thanks to university style leftism, this classic definition has been tossed aside in favor of a sociological definition of racism. What is this definition? In a nutshell, leftists believe that racism = prejudice + power. Therefore, since whites comprise the majority of congress, corporate executives, and other prominent institutions, then that automatically amounts to racism. Since only whites can be racist by that definition, then any manifestation of prejudice on a white person’s part, whether it’s telling an innocuous joke, subscribing to a stereotype about a given group, or refusing to associate with black people, is racism.

But do power disparities and prejudice alone really amount to racism? A look at the historical record would indicate otherwise. For example, the Arab primary sources on the Crusades that I’m reading are rife with negative descriptions of Europeans, including the occasional “blue-eyed infidel” insult. So, there are negative physical descriptions of a different group, combined with Arab Muslim chauvinist beliefs. Clear example of racism, right? Wrong, because there is not a single example of those Arabs suggesting that Europeans were inherently inferior or less human on account of their birth. Another example of how ethnic prejudice and discrimination don’t necessarily equal racism is the Yuan Dynasty (ie. Mongol rule) of China. When the Mongols gained controlled of China, they implemented a social hierarchy that placed Mongols at the top, Semu (or “people with colored eyes,” primarily Central Asians and Europeans) below, and then the native Han Chinese at the very bottom. When Marco Polo visited China, he enjoyed a higher position within the hierarchy than the vast majority of China’s population. Clearly, this is a manifestation of hierarchical racism! Except again, the Mongols did not endorse any beliefs postulating the inherent superiority or inferiority of those respective groups. In fact, their hierarchy was tied to their specific conquest of China. Since the Mongols first conquered and successfully subjugated the Northern Chinese before finally conquering Southern China, Northern Chinese enjoyed greater position within the hierarchy than Southern Chinese, since the Southerners had not been subjugated for as long, and thus were less trustworthy.

Most of what the left complains about “racism” in today’s Western world is a combination of prejudice, majoritarianism, and standard xenophobia. What do I mean by majoritarianism? Well, since whites have historically been the large majorities of both the United States and Canada, then it makes sense that they wield most of the power and determine the social norms of both countries. As much as leftists like to complain about the “normalization” of whiteness or how whites are seen as “standard,” this “normalization” has always been the historical norm, as the majority group will almost always set the pace when it comes to the development of societies. As Razib Khan once pointed out, both the Roman and Ottoman Empires were multiracial, multiethnic, and multireligious, and yet there was never any doubt that the Romans and Turkish Muslims were the dominant core of those respective empires. Even powerful minorities such as the Manchu overlords of China’s Qing Dynasty underwent a significant degree of assimilation into Han Chinese culture.

True racism has been dead within mainstream North America for quite some time. Aside from a few HBD bloggers, neo-nazis, and fringe alternative right publications, there are very few prominent voices who endorse genuine racism. Those who do are subjected to harsh media scrutiny. Just ask famed biologist James Watson. Therefore, accusations of racism and racial supremacy should not be made lightly. So with that in mind, what does a genuinely racist or supremacist society look like? While examples of such societies abound in the third world, I’ve decided to highlight a developed, technologically advanced country that frequently seeks to advertise its progressive Western credentials.

That country would be Israel! Rest assured, I am not about to go on some overused white nationalist diatribe about how Jews hypocritically support multiculturalism in the West while simultaneously upholding ethnocracy in Israel. Kevin MacDonald and many others have already tirelessly documented such inconsistency. Rather, Israel is a perfect demonstration of a society that practices racism in the strictest sense of the word.

What are some examples that demonstrate that Israel is racist, as opposed to just plain prejudiced and xenophobic? Well, just recently, hundreds of thousands of Israeli Jews attended the funeral of controversial Sephardic Jewish religious leader Ovadia Yosef. Among his many other gems, Yosef had the following to say about the inherent value of non-Jews:

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel…Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi (lord or master) and eat. That is why gentiles were created.”

He reserved some special vitriol for Palestinians in particular, as well as Arabs as a whole:

“All these evil people should perish from this world. God should strike them with a plague, them and these Palestinians…It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate them. They are evil and damnable.”

Yup, one of the most hallowed figures in Israeli society was a genocidal bigot, who even received an endorsement from New York Democratic mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio, who among other things lauded Yosef’s “sensitivity.”

Nor is Yosef alone when it comes to Israeli mainstream politicians and figures endorsing blatant racism. Israel’s current prime minister Bibi Netanyahu once bragged that as finance minister, his policies of cutting child subsidies resulted in a reduction of Palestinian birthrates within Israel. Recently, black African migrants have become the newest target of Israeli Jewish venom, and have lately been subjected to the same invective and “demographic threat” rhetoric that Palestinians know all too well.

In North America, individuals who espoused such bigotry would be shunned, demonized, and placed on the SPLC’s hate list. In Israel and most non-Western countries, such individuals are heads of major political parties. Keep that in mind the next time some college leftist treats the West as the supreme embodiment of oppression and racial supremacy.


Update: As if you needed any further evidence of Israel’s fundamentally supremacist society, the Israeli Supreme Court just trashed a proposal to recognize an Israeli nationality. Historically, Israel has defined nationality by ethnic background, with Israel defining itself as a nation for all Jews. It’s crazy to think about, but Israel is probably the only country in the world that doesn’t recognize its own nationality.

This entry was posted in Cultural Marxism, Israel, Jewry, Middle East, Race, Racism and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to What a Real Supremacist Culture Looks Like: Racism Versus Majoritarianism

  1. WmarkW says:

    Westerners accept the necessity and legitimacy of Israel existing as an ethno-state, because of the obvious problems the lack of one caused Jews in the middle part of the last century.

    Obviously those college leftists don’t know what they’re talking about, since non-white peoples move into Western nations, not out of them. John Derbyshire has a column up on VDare today about world population growth, and how successful societies are shrinking and failed ones are growing, which is increasing pressure on the former to open up to refugees from the latter. It will take broader HBD acceptance to counter the argument that everyone can be just like us, if allowed to live in our environment.

    • RunswithScissors says:

      “It will take broader HBD acceptance to counter the argument that everyone can be just like us, if allowed to live in our environment.”

      While I agree with the thrust of your post, I cannot agree with this point, per se.

      HBD is a legitimate empirical inquiry. A scientific curiosity with real world relevance. But most of the HBD crowd are not scientists.

      Rushton, Jensen, Watson are scientists. Peer reviewed. They have to support their theories with data. Then they have to resolve criticisms with honest reasoning and honest data. They have been shunned, of course, but it would be foolish to think that many respected academics less brave than them, do not agree with them.

      The likes of HBD Chick are intelligent, inquisitive and thorough amateurs. Forgive me, but I must make that cliched parroted observation, often trumpeted by The Cathedral, that correlation does not equal causation.”

      These HBD bloggers (and bloggers, not scientists, is what they are) drum up convenient correlations or collections of murky anecdotes to support their position.

      Mating habits in Europe are in vogue at the moment. Northwestern Europeans = Outbred Freethinkers, Other Europeans = Almost there.

      They cite medieval mating patterns–as supplied by medieval records. Medieval.

      But most of Northern Europe’s dominance has occurred in the last 300 years. Not immediately following the Medieval Era.

      Immediately following the Medieval Era, those swarthy wogs, the Italians, Portuguese and Spaniards were either producing cultural works not scene since the Classical Era or creating empires not seen since the same period.

      Prior to that, during the Medieval Era, it was the hopelessly disorganized Balkan people — Southern Slavs and Greeks — who lived in the most advanced European societies of the Byzantine Empire.

      Then after all of that, the Russians–those pigish semi-asiatic Slavs–had some contact with Western European culture and swiftly began producing the likes of Chekhov, Dostoevsky, Rimsky-Korsakov.

      The (blogger) HBD crowd will tell you all these developments are primarily due to some intricate matrix of mating patterns and selection for intelligence and creativity.

      But the traditional explanation that culture (that is, the diffusion of ideas) provides a much more parsimonious explanation.

      For example, look at the differential economic, social and political advancement of the Serbs and Croats (two genetically identical groups) in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

      Croats were better adapted to modernity. Serbs less so. Macedonians and Bulgarians, much less so. But they are not that different–according to the data on IQ and inbreeding.

      So it seems something other than genetics is at play….

      Race is real. Ethnicity is real. And IQ *measures* something real.

      But culture (and history and economics and sociology and *chance*) are real too.

      The HBD crowd rarely consider the contrary aside from the most easily debunked, asine libtard cliches.

      If Universities were allowed to argue un-PC topics, there would be plenty of peer review. But they do not, so HBD enthusiasts must rely on the insights of the likes of HBD Chick.

      BAG and Dota are remarkable in the Dark Enlightenment, IMHO, because they merely articulate, very well I might add, common sense interpretations of history and current events with decency, moderation and honesty.

      Unfortunately and maddeningly, their decency, honesty and moderation are interpreted as hatred, bigotry and extremism to the clueless brainwashed “polite” classes today.

      • Dota says:

        Thank you for your high praise my friend. I do agree with you that HBD is a legitimate field of study but my problem with the HBD crowd is that their worldviews tend to rob human actors of their agency by attributing everything to genetics. Our biology does determine the way in which we behave to some extent (gender differences) but taking it to an extreme necessarily entails a loss of individual (and collective) choice.

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        I agree with Dota on this one. Too much of an emphasis on HBD and evo psych robs people of their agency, and lets them off the hook.

        For example, many manosphere and PUA communities assert that the appalling behavior of today’s North American women is a result of evolution and women’s instincts. But of course, as Dota demonstrated in his post on women and culture, this is nonsense. While women may have some penchant for such behaviors, their behavior has less to do with evo psych and more to do with the fact that they simply aren’t held to any standards.

        What’s ironic is that even as manosphere types rail against women’s behavior, they end up excusing it by saying “meh, what can you do? It’s in their biology.”

        I also think that white nationalists who attribute Jewish power to high Jewish IQ and their evolutionary strategy of being a highly collectivist and chauvinist group are letting white gentiles off the hook.

        Since white nationalists are a small minority, they could learn a thing or two from the Jewish success story.

      • batterytrain says:

        Exactly! I never got the fascination with the “Norsemen”, I was watching the show “Vikings” recently, (very good show and realistic portrayal btw) and their gods and lives revolved around basically being violent thugs with axes, stealing, looting, raping and killing and the one that basically did this the most and most efficiently was granted the best passage to “Valhalla” and the admiration of the “Gods”, who basically praised and advocated killings and violence illustrating behavior not unlike modern day Zulu’s or/Africans/tribal Native Americans. I can’t help but think that those Northern European women are also the result of rape, kidnappings and theft by these uber Norsemen from elsewhere; to think these people are supposed to be the epitome of human evolution, what a joke!! It’s glorification of a race and culture of violent thugs and thieves who believed in all sorts of backward idiotic superstitions!

        On the other hand, the Woginess and Asiaticness of the Southern and Eastern Europeans/Russians are hyper exaggerated; there are plenty of Southern Europeans that have trademark Euro appearances like deep Red colored hair and different eye colors; while Russians are basically the result of Viking interbreeding with R1a tribes (the real you know who); I have seen so many bearded Russians with big eyes and strong Caucasian/Caucasoid features, it would disprove the Asiaticness right off the bat from sampling. Hell I have seen Russians with strong pseudo-Norse Scythian looks, it’s not even funny. Just look at some Russian authors like Chekhov, Tolstoy to see that they are not exactly “asiatics”.

      • ale says:

        Xera: i totally agree with you 100% and by the way i am happy to see some about you after all this time, to be honest since day 1, i got a crush on you, i always liked you through your comments, i think you must be a handsome man, too bad you were banned from Robert’s blog because bad behaviour, but that same bad behaviour was what turn me on about you, i never knew this was you posting with another name, until some commenters discovered it, i hope you always remenber your internet love, your girlfriend Ale.

      • Esoj says:

        Ale: Xera was ok, but i miss the most …. Brengunn! yeah.

      • coward says:

        Ewwww…..Xera boy, faggot boy Narut00/ale is hitting on you! Ewwwww……so gross. This is why I am against homosexuality….stuff like this. So gross.

      • ProudFeministGirl says:


      • Bay Area Guy says:

        @ Proudfeministgirl

        You are free to change your name, just be sure to stick with it from now on. We’ve already had a sockpuppet controversy, and don’t want to have to deal with that again.

        Also, try to refrain from using too many ALL CAPS.

      • ProudFeministGirl says:

        : P ,the caps were because he reached my limit, i won’t tolerate ever again to be called someone i am not, i already told him 1 million times i am a woman ( and so damn proud of it) ,but he insisted ; ) .

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        @ batterytrain

        Please refrain from the ad hominems, we don’t want a flame war.

      • batterytrain says:

        That was someone else sockpuppeting me BAG, usually my avatar is green and white when I post and I don’t write in caps when I am posting.

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        @ Real batterytrain

        I just saw.

        @ Fake batterytrain

        Do not use sockuppets or assume a fake identity. This is a warning.

      • ProudFeministGirl says:

        Coward, my female intuition tell me that the fake batterytrain is YOU, what a rude person that don’t listen to me. And you must be a MULATTO after all. HAND! : P

      • coward says:

        Its not me. You can check the IP address BAG. And Ale, shut your dirty trap you fucking cunt.

      • Shanky says:

        Wow Coward., you got your ass banned from Lindsay’s blog again it appears… How many times he had to ban you???

    • Bay Area Guy says:

      @ Mark

      Whatever legitimate reasons that might have existed for establishing a Jewish ethnostate have long since been rendered moot. It certainly doesn’t justify the blatant discrimination, persecution, and Jewish supremacist vitriol that characterizes mainstream Israeli society.

      Jews are hardly in danger of a second Shoah. In fact, I once read an article that more and more Israeli Jews are acquiring foreign citizenships, and many thousands have already moved out of Israel in favor of countries such as the U.S.

      Besides, reliable history on the I/P conflict asserts that the process of establishing a Jewish state in historic Palestine was well underway, and would have occurred irrespective of the Nazi holocaust.

  2. Reads says:

    Well.. Arabs killed over 120 million africans, and 11 million alone in 1955-2005, in Sudan..

    They are probably biggest racist in this world.

  3. Pingback: Guilt Game: Reflections on the Curious Masochism of Wimpy Whites | Occident Invicta, the unconquered west

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s