Granted, Whites are practically prohibited from criticizing its tenants in polite company and in public, but people who aren’t White such as yourself or (and this is certainly no put down) who are more prominent than you, such as Salim Mansur and Tariq Fatah, are given more leeway.
I’m sure Runswithscissors made this comparison in good faith but I simply cannot be compared to Salim Mansur (University of Western Ontario) and Tariq Fatah (of the Muslim Canadian Congress). While these individuals appear to outwardly challenge Political Correctness by bashing Islam, they operate well within its framework. As BAG once pointed out, Muslims have become an acceptable whipping boy post 9-11 and hence it is socially acceptable to bash Muslims while remaining within the boundaries of PC. What is NOT acceptable is criticizing Jewry and Israel, which is something the likes of Fatah and Mansur refrain from doing. Rather, they shower Israel and Jewry with lavish praise.
So are Muslims like Mansur and Fatah friends of the west? Let us begin by examining their socio/political views. Outside of their views on Islam, these Muslims (and others like them) happen to be extremely secular and very liberal. They subscribe to mainstream Feminist doctrine, gay rights, multiculturalism (Mansur is an exception), and generally mainstream Liberalism. They are only critical of Muslim immigration while giving non Muslim immigration a free pass. Salim Mansur openly advocates restricting Muslim immigration while Tarek Fatah waxes bleeding heart liberal on how dehumanizing the Canadian immigration process can be. In a speech soaked in Chutzpah, Mansur told the House of Commons that while third world immigration is bad, it is Muslim immigration that is the worst. This makes no sense as one cannot homogenize the ethnically/linguistically diverse Muslim world. It’s ridiculous to insinuate that Pakistanis and Indonesians share a common culture just as it is equally ludicrous to assume that Filipinos and Italians share a common culture (on account of their shared Catholic religion).
So why is it that the Canadian media pays more attention than necessary to these leftist Muslim talking heads? The answer lies in contemporary immigration trends. On one hand, Muslim immigrants (with their visibly alien religious practices) can be used by Jewry to push forward a multicultural and cultural Marxist agenda. On the other hand, despite their ethnic and linguistic differences, the vast majority of Muslims harbour an anti-Israel and antisemitic grudge. This will not do. It seems that organized Jewry is trying to have their own cake and eat it too. On one hand, they want an influx of third world immigrants into the West, yet on the other hand they wish to screen out problematic antisemitic Muslims. To accomplish this feat Muslims must be demonized, and who better to do it than other Muslims themselves.
On the Right it’s fruitcakes like Ann Coulter who blast Muslim immigrants while turning a blind eye to other non Muslim Asian immigrants. Kevin MacDonald tackles this hypocrisy head one when he writes:
“But if all these peoples are to be allowed to immigrate (legally, of course) en masse to the United States, how does Coulter think that the Christian culture that she seems to think is so desirable can be maintained? Why just go after Muslims? The common sense of it is that our open borders immigration policy puts the entire culture in play. If Christianity is to have any special place at all, it will have to fight for it, and, given the demographic trends, its long term prospects aren’t good.”
Dota versus the House Muslims
I refer to the likes of Fatah and Mansur as House Muslims. It isn’t very original I’ll grant, but adequately descriptive. If leftist, cultural Marxist, and Liberal trends have disenfranchised white Canadians (the silent majority) then it stands to reason that Muslim sellouts in service of such elite powers are essentially House Muslims; for they certainly don’t represent the interests of the majority of Canadians. Their constant efforts at redefining Canadian culture along liberal lines indicates loud and clear that they are no friends of Canada. They sell a leftist agenda by propping up an Islamic bogeyman. These sellouts thrive on Media attention and accolades by bashing the people they supposedly represent but do not care one whit about Canada’s White Christian heritage. If they did they would have joined the Paleoconservative movement a long time ago.
When one sides with the people instead of their corrupt leftist elites, the support that one receives is not only gratifying, but humbling. I was recently invited by a trusted friend to speak at his Church on a diverse set of topics ranging from: Islam, Christianity, and contemporary cultural trends. I spoke loudly in favour of a White and Christian Canada that took pride in its European heritage. I denounced liberal PC trends and surprisingly got no hostility for criticizing Organized Jewry. The audience hung onto every word I said and a few even approached me after the session to question me further. I’ve never felt more important in my life! These individuals even told me that they felt like minorities in Canada due to their pro West and Christian beliefs. I stand now doubly assured that Bay Area Guy and myself are on the right path and that our cause is indeed just. The support and admiration of the average Canadian means far more to me than the shallow platitudes of the mainstream media.